Travelers — Deal Risk Assessment

2026-02-24 · Travelers Opal 2026 · Proposal Stage
Deal Snapshot
Account / Deal
Travelers — Travelers Opal 2026
Owner
Jen Oliver (AE) · Conor Leary (overlay)
Stage / Target Close
Proposal  2026-03-27
Size / Strategic Importance
$309,000 base ($500K upside) · High
Key Champions
Betsey Shannon (marketing owner, highly engaged) · Dave Morgan (use case/ROI orchestrator, driving concurrent workstreams)
Current Status
ROI working session completed 2/19 — bottom-up approach agreed. Legal actively redlining contract; redlines expected back this week. TechGov/vendor approval in flight. Shafkat–Jim O'Brien exec meeting this Thursday. Four parallel workstreams: legal, TechGov, ROI, dollar-threshold approval.
Total Risks
8
Known Risks
8
Assumed Risks
0
Play Code Legend
P1ELT exec bridge (C-suite ↔ C-suite)
P2SLT bridge (VP/Director ↔ VP/Director)
P3Back-channeling / political intel
P4Value / business outcomes workshop
P5Technical / architecture risk session
P6Commercial alignment session
P7On-site
P8Own internal business case structure
P9Customer-facing exec 1-pager
P10Internal exec briefing 1-pager
P11Pricing / term levers
Risk Register
ID Category Risk Evidence Impact Plays Owner & By When
R1 Paper Vendor approval process is opaque and slow — could take 1+ month
Known
  • 2/13 sync: "could take 1+ month with no visibility into steps."
  • A $0 POC started in October still isn't through architecture review.
  • Neither Conor nor Jen has visibility into approvers or status.
Critical path blocker. March 27 close impossible if vendor approval runs its historical pace. P1 P2 P3 Jen — Patrick West → Andrew Jaworski exec push, this week
R2 Paper Dollar threshold may trigger higher/slower approval path
Known
  • 2/19 ROI session: Dave flagged dollar thresholds require different approval.
  • 2/12: procurement flagged credit rollover as non-starter.
Unknown escalation path could add weeks. Combined with R1, creates compounding paper risk. P3 P6 P11 Conor/Jen — surface thresholds once pricing finalized
R3 Paper Legal redlines returning with unknown scope
Known
  • 2/19: attorney completed redlining, returning early this week.
  • Attorney already flagged technical question on AI infrastructure (Gemini).
Extensive redlines = multi-week legal back-and-forth. AI-specific terms likely contentious for FSI. P6 Jen — receive and triage redlines this week
R4 Value ROI calculation gated on Betsey's usage data
Known
  • 2/19: "Betsey's team providing usage data by Monday EOD."
  • Betsey's original scoring data was lost (save issue).
  • Mark cannot build value calculation without user counts and frequency.
Any delay in usage data delays the entire business case presentation to Dave and blocks commercial progression. P4 Conor — follow up with Betsey if not received, 2026-02-25
R5 Commercial Credit rollover terms non-negotiable for Travelers procurement
Known
  • 2/12: "Dave flagged procurement team does not accept use-it-or-lose-it terms. Will introduce procurement team to discuss."
Could stall commercial negotiation at procurement stage even after business case is approved. P6 P11 Jen/Conor — prepare term alternatives before procurement engagement
R6 Political Dave Morgan's interpersonal dynamics slow internal progress
Known
  • 2/13: "Dave is not forthcoming with details, his internal relationships may actually slow things down (people don't respond well to him)."
  • Betsey is "intimidated by Dave."
Internal alignment and vendor approval acceleration depend on working around Dave's domain, not through him. P2 P3 Jen — Andrew Jaworski path bypasses Dave's bottleneck
R7 Paper FDE classification unresolved — may trigger separate SOW cycle
Known
  • 2/13: If FDE is classified as IT Services (not bundled in Advanced), Travelers requires their services SOW template, adding procurement delay.
  • Conor owns resolution via Suzanne.
Separate services classification = additional procurement review cycle on top of existing paper workstreams. P6 Conor — resolve via Suzanne, this week
R8 Timing Architecture review backlogged — 1-2 month estimate
Known
  • 2/12: "AI vendor approval timeline 1-2 months. Architecture review team backlogged with AI approvals."
  • Strong business case is the stated accelerator.
Even with exec push, architecture review unlikely to compress below 3-4 weeks. March 27 is at risk. P1 P2 Jen — exec acceleration via Jaworski/Patrick West
Mitigation Plays — Cross-Map
P1 — ELT Exec Bridge
Risks: R1, R8
Shafkat–Jim O'Brien Thursday; Patrick West → Andrew Jaworski
P2 — SLT Bridge
Risks: R1, R6, R8
Andrew Jaworski engagement to bypass Dave's bottleneck and accelerate vendor approval
P3 — Back-Channeling / Political Intel
Risks: R1, R2, R6
Visibility into vendor approval status, dollar thresholds, Dave dynamics
P6 — Commercial Alignment Session
Risks: R2, R3, R5, R7
Legal redlines triage, FDE classification, procurement term prep
P11 — Pricing / Term Levers
Risks: R2, R5
Credit rollover alternatives, dollar threshold awareness
Action Plan — Must-Do Priorities
1
[P2] Execute Andrew Jaworski introduction via Patrick West
Political Paper Timing
Linked risks: R1, R6, R8
Why: Single highest-impact action — unlocks vendor approval visibility, bypasses Dave's interpersonal bottleneck, and provides exec air cover for March close.
2
[P4] Confirm Betsey's usage data was delivered; unblock Mark's ROI calculation
Value
Linked risks: R4
Why: Entire business case is gated on this input. Mark cannot build the value calculation without it.
3
[P1] Prep Shafkat for Jim O'Brien exec meeting Thursday
Paper Timing
Linked risks: R1, R8
Why: Jim O'Brien represents digital marketing + business insurance — strong internal ally for accelerating approval. Betsey endorsed him. Prep call Tuesday 4:30 PM ET.
4
[P6] Receive and triage legal redlines
Paper
Linked risks: R3
Why: Redlines expected this week. Fast triage determines whether legal is a 1-week or 4-week workstream.
5
[P6] Resolve FDE classification (services vs. Advanced) via Suzanne
Paper
Linked risks: R7
Why: If services classification, it triggers a separate SOW template and procurement cycle — must know before presenting pricing.
Action Plan — Secondary Tasks
Internal Exec Support

Exec Escalation Required

Top Risks Requiring Exec Help (Max 3)
What We've Already Done to Mitigate
Specific Requests from ELT / SLT